mnc NEWS
Reviews

Five budget earbuds, tested on a two-week commute

We wore each pair for a full week on a train, a bus and a walk through traffic. Noise cancellation separated them far less than fit and call quality did.

  • All five under $90; each worn for a full week of real commuting
  • Call quality varied more than any other measure — by a wide margin
  • Two of five could not hold a stable connection in a crowded station
Audio gear on a shop counter, of the kind tested for this review.
Audio gear on a shop counter, of the kind tested for this review.Original uploader was Mcld at en.wikipedia / Wikimedia Commons

Budget earbuds have converged. All five pairs we tested sound broadly similar, all five have some form of active noise cancellation, and all five claim battery life within an hour of each other. What separates them is everything the specification sheet does not list.

We wore each pair for a full week of a real commute: a twenty-minute train, a bus, and a fifteen-minute walk alongside traffic. Every pair was bought at retail. We do not accept review samples.

Noise cancellation is not the differentiator

On the train, all five reduced the low rumble by a broadly similar amount. None handled the higher-frequency squeal on curves well, which is the noise that is actually unpleasant.

What varied was pressure. Two pairs produced the sensation of altitude change that some people find intolerable and others do not notice at all. If you are among the people who notice, that alone decides the purchase, and no specification will tell you in advance.

The specification tells you decibels of reduction. It does not tell you whether wearing them for forty minutes makes your ears ache.— Our reviewer, after week three

Calls are where they separate

Call quality was the largest difference and the least advertised. We recorded the same script on each pair from a windy street corner and played the recordings blind.

Two were consistently intelligible. One was acceptable indoors and unusable outdoors. Two were rated unintelligible on the street by every listener. All five claim multi-microphone beamforming.

Connection in a crowd

Two of the five dropped or stuttered repeatedly in a crowded station at rush hour — an environment with hundreds of competing radios. This is a real failure mode for a commuting product and it appears on no spec sheet.

Audio gear on a shop counter, of the kind tested for this review.
Audio gear on a shop counter, of the kind tested for this review.Original uploader was Mcld at en.wikipedia / Wikimedia Commons
  • Tested: five pairs under $90, each worn for a full week of commuting
  • Noise cancellation: broadly similar; ear pressure varied and matters more
  • Call quality: two good, one indoor-only, two unintelligible outdoors
  • Connection: two of five unstable in a crowded station at rush hour

Our recommendation is unexciting: buy from a retailer with a genuine return window, wear them for a full week before deciding, and make one call from a windy street before the window closes. Fit and call quality decide this category, and neither can be evaluated in a shop.

1,840 comments 5,120 shares Reviews

Read nextShow More

Comments1,840

0 / 500
  • L
    Laura M.Tampa, FL2 hours ago

    You do not see many pieces that show the reporting process like this anymore.

  • L
    Laura M.Portland, OR3 minutes ago

    Clearly written, and the section on the numbers is more careful than most coverage of this.

  • L
    Laura M.Buffalo, NY2 hours ago

    Clearly written, and the section on the numbers is more careful than most coverage of this.

  • L
    Laura M.St. Louis, MO3 minutes ago

    I had not thought about it from this angle. It shifted my view a little.

Back to top